By Nsan Ndoma-Neji, Calabar
The wife of clan head of Nkonib Quo clan, Ikot Ansa community, Calabar Municipality Local Government Area of Cross River State, Mrs. Arit Maurice Omin-Iso, has called on the abductors of her husband, who abducted him from their residence on December 23, 2024, to release her husband.
The clan head was said to have been abducted from his residence by armed men, suspected to be security operatives at about 7pm to unknown destination.
The monarch’s wife made the appeal while making comments on the mysterious disappearance of hubby during a chat with our correspondent in Calabar yesterday.
Mrs Omin-Iso called on security agents to release her husband so that he can return home to join his immediate family members.
She said, “I want my husband back home to join us, whoever had been holding my husband hostage should please release him to us. Chief is a peaceful person who cannot even hurt a fly. I don’t know why they are holding him hostage.”
Although no security agency has admitted that the monarch, whose whereabouts remains unknown, is in its custody since his abduction since December 23, 2024.
But findings by our correspondent however revealed that the monarch’s travails began when he and other seven claimants dragged the state government to court in suit No: HC/314/2022, on behalf of (Ikot Ansa) Qua Clan to challenge what they described as illegal acquisition of 369.579 hectares of their communal land by the state government for private purpose of Summit Hills.
However, six out of eight claimants in the suit decided to withdraw on the ground that they were not ready to fight the state government because they were not consulted before the case was filed in court.
Determined to follow the matter to the latter, Ntufam Maurice Omin-Iso and Ntufam Donatus Etim continued with the matter in court and eventually settled the case with the government, executed terms of settlement.
Upon reliasing that Etim and Iso were making some progress with the matter, Ntufam Paul Asim Ita with members of his faction returned to same court with another application for joinder as defendants against Ntufam Omin-Iso and Ntufam Etim, alleging that the duo did not seek the community’s consent before going to court.
After the hearing of the application, the court dismissed and refused the joinder request on the grounds that the parties seeking to be joined, having withdrawn from the suit, cannot in turn bring an application for joinder as defendants against the claimants in the same suit
On March 7, 2022, at High Court 2, the presiding judge, Hon Justice B.T Ebuta, after describing the act of the six claimants as an attempt to frustrate justice in the case, ruled against the parties seeking to be joined as defendants.
The court thereafter ordered the release of 23 hectares of the land to Omin-Iso and Etim in compliance with the judgment of the court, The then Attorney-General of Cross River State, late Mr. Tanko Ashang, SAN, thereafter wrote in a letter dayed6 March 31, 2022, asking the Surveyor-General of the state to carve out 23 hectares from the contentious plot of land and hand it over to Omin-Iso and Etim, in line with the consent judgment of the High Court.
A letter dated March 11, 2022 from Summit Hills also directed the Surveyor-General of the state to follow suit to the claimants.
Our correspondent gathered that un compliance with and obedience to the consent judgment, the Attorney General of the state on September 30, 2022 wrote to Ntufam Omin-Iso and Ntufam Etim, formally handing over the 23 hectares of the said land to the claimants.
It was further gathered that when Paul Asim Ita and his faction, who had earlier withdrawn from the case and also failed in all their efforts to frustrate the judgment, they again filed a case in the High Court in HC/147/2022, asking the court to set aside the consent judgment entered in suit number HC/314/2021.
Hon Justice Elias Abuo dismissed the case seeking to set aside the consent judgment.
It was gathered that when the faction, having failed in all areas, thereafter approached the Cross River State fovernor for a familiarization visit and declared their intentions to cross
carpet from the Peooles Demicratic Party to the All Progreasives Congress, just to curry the governor’s favour so that he can assist members of the faction reverse the consent judgment, so that the land can be handed over to their faction, which had earlier withdrawn from the suit.
However, on April 4, 2024, the present Attorney-General of the state through executive order of the state government, purportedly wrote a letter handing the same land to Paul Assim Ita, despite the earlier consent judgement.
Similarly, the state Commissioner for Lands in a publication dated April 10, 2024 and 16, published in the Nigerian Chronicles page 15, handed over the same 23 hectares of that parcel of land in question to Paul Assim Ita, purportedly revoking the layout plan earlier approved and issued to the claimants in line with the consent judgment, thereby handing over the land to Assim Ita’s faction irrespective of the consent judgment.
Consequent upon this, Ntufam Omin-Iso and Ntufam Etim approached the High Court of Cross River State in suit No. HC/86/2024, seeking for an order setting aside the purported handing over of the said land to Assim Ita and his cohorts and for perpetual injunction, restraining the first to thirrd defendants from handing over any part of the 23 hectares of land released to the claimants in 2022 by the government of Cross River State in compliance with the consent judgment of the High Court of Cross River State in suit number HC/314/2021 filed on March 7, 2021, among order reliefs sought.
Sadly, during the pendency of suit number HC/86/2024, which challenged the fragrant disobedience of the judgement of the High Court, the Attorney-General of Cross River State, via an executive order of the state governor wrote to the Police, requesting coverage for Paul Assim Ita and his faction to enter and bulldoze beacons and altered the already approved plan thereby causing breakdown of law and order within the area,
However, while the suit challenging validity and legality of the actions of the Cross River State government and Paul Assim Ita was still pending and judgment reserved for February 4,2025, unfortunately, on December 23, 2024 at about 7:pm a group of armed men who an eye witness said stormed Ntufam Omin-Iso’s residence with an ash coloured Ford Ranger van and a Red Corolla car, whisked away Omin-Iso to a yet to be known destination, leaving the victim ‘s family in agony.
However, lead counsel to the monarch, Chief Obono Obla, who earlier declined comment on the issue, insisted that the state Attorney-General knows the whereabout of his client.
Obla claimed that on January 4, 2025, during a phone conversation, the Attorney-General, Mr Edemdem Charles Ani, had admitted that the abducted monarch, Omin-Iso, whose whereabout is yet to be known by family was arrested by security operatives and kept in custody of the Department of State Service because he was becoming a security risk.
He alleged that the Attorney-General is angry with Omin-Iso for installling his brother as clan head, grabbed lands belonging to the government, and carved out a community in Ikot Ansa for himself.
Obla said, “The AG promised that Chief Omin-Iso would be released but would be charged to court.”
But contrary to this claim, the Cross River State Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice of the state, Ani, in a statement released on Thursday night last week alleged that the various media reports linking him and his office to the incident were all false and baseless, denying any involvement in Chief Omin-Iso’s travail, stressing that the media reports were attempts calculated to tarnish his good image built over the years.
But Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court Calabar, in suit No. FHC/CA/CS/3/2025, had early this month ordered the DSS, and the Attorney-General to produce Omin-Iso in court on January 15, 2025.
Continuing, Ani argued that there was no record of any judgments in favour of Chief Omin-Iso against the Cross River State government “involving land or chieftaincy issues.”
He asked that if Omin-Iso was abducted and detained on December 21, how was he able to show up at Zone Six for questioning on December 23, 2024?
Also reacting to the issue, one of the community youth leaders in the area, Mbora Bassey, stated that the motives behind the abduction of Chief Omin-Iso, by security agents suspected to be backed by government officials, from his residence at Esuku Otu, Ikot Ansa, Calabar Municipality Local Government Area of Cross River State was as a result of land dispute.
